You are here: Home / Sections / Economy / MEPs discuss Franco-German partnership

MEPs discuss Franco-German partnership

16 November 2011 By

On Wednesday MEPs discuss the needs for a stronger EU economic governance with President of European Council, Herman Van Rompuy, President of the European Commission, Jose Manuel Barroso and President of the Euro group, Jean-Claude Juncker.

Related Posts

    No related posts found

Related Search

Filed Under: Economy, Quotes for Comment Tagged With: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

  1. snesokk1 says:
    16 November 2011 at 10:01

    [..YouTube..] The video should have subtitles

  2. snesokk1 says:
    16 November 2011 at 10:01

    [..YouTube..] The video should have subtitles

  3. snesokk1 says:
    16 November 2011 at 10:01

    [..YouTube..] The video should have subtitles

  4. snesokk1 says:
    16 November 2011 at 10:01

    [..YouTube..] The video should have subtitles

  5. snesokk1 says:
    16 November 2011 at 10:01

    [..YouTube..] The video should have subtitles

  6. snesokk1 says:
    16 November 2011 at 10:01

    [..YouTube..] The video should have subtitles

  7. BathtubSkyPirate says:
    16 November 2011 at 13:58

    [..YouTube..] So can anyone explain what these idiots are talking about.

  8. BathtubSkyPirate says:
    16 November 2011 at 13:58

    [..YouTube..] So can anyone explain what these idiots are talking about.

  9. BathtubSkyPirate says:
    16 November 2011 at 13:58

    [..YouTube..] So can anyone explain what these idiots are talking about.

  10. BathtubSkyPirate says:
    16 November 2011 at 13:58

    [..YouTube..] So can anyone explain what these idiots are talking about.

  11. BathtubSkyPirate says:
    16 November 2011 at 13:58

    [..YouTube..] So can anyone explain what these idiots are talking about.

  12. BathtubSkyPirate says:
    16 November 2011 at 13:58

    [..YouTube..] So can anyone explain what these idiots are talking about.

  13. BathtubSkyPirate says:
    16 November 2011 at 13:58

    [..YouTube..] So can anyone explain what these idiots are talking about.

  14. BathtubSkyPirate says:
    16 November 2011 at 13:58

    [..YouTube..] So can anyone explain what these idiots are talking about.

  15. BathtubSkyPirate says:
    16 November 2011 at 13:58

    [..YouTube..] So can anyone explain what these idiots are talking about.

  16. BathtubSkyPirate says:
    16 November 2011 at 13:58

    [..YouTube..] So can anyone explain what these idiots are talking about.

  17. BathtubSkyPirate says:
    16 November 2011 at 13:58

    [..YouTube..] So can anyone explain what these idiots are talking about.

  18. ElComanchero says:
    16 November 2011 at 17:13

    [..YouTube..] This is fucking hilarious, so incredibly boring that I’m actually starting to fall asleep

  19. ElComanchero says:
    16 November 2011 at 17:13

    [..YouTube..] This is fucking hilarious, so incredibly boring that I’m actually starting to fall asleep

  20. ElComanchero says:
    16 November 2011 at 17:13

    [..YouTube..] This is fucking hilarious, so incredibly boring that I’m actually starting to fall asleep

  21. ElComanchero says:
    16 November 2011 at 17:13

    [..YouTube..] This is fucking hilarious, so incredibly boring that I’m actually starting to fall asleep

  22. ElComanchero says:
    16 November 2011 at 17:13

    [..YouTube..] This is fucking hilarious, so incredibly boring that I’m actually starting to fall asleep

  23. ElComanchero says:
    16 November 2011 at 17:13

    [..YouTube..] This is fucking hilarious, so incredibly boring that I’m actually starting to fall asleep

  24. ElComanchero says:
    16 November 2011 at 17:13

    [..YouTube..] This is fucking hilarious, so incredibly boring that I’m actually starting to fall asleep

  25. ElComanchero says:
    16 November 2011 at 17:13

    [..YouTube..] This is fucking hilarious, so incredibly boring that I’m actually starting to fall asleep

  26. ElComanchero says:
    16 November 2011 at 17:13

    [..YouTube..] This is fucking hilarious, so incredibly boring that I’m actually starting to fall asleep

  27. ElComanchero says:
    16 November 2011 at 17:13

    [..YouTube..] This is fucking hilarious, so incredibly boring that I’m actually starting to fall asleep

  28. ElComanchero says:
    16 November 2011 at 17:13

    [..YouTube..] This is fucking hilarious, so incredibly boring that I’m actually starting to fall asleep

  29. ElComanchero says:
    16 November 2011 at 17:13

    [..YouTube..] This is fucking hilarious, so incredibly boring that I’m actually starting to fall asleep

  30. ElComanchero says:
    16 November 2011 at 17:13

    [..YouTube..] This is fucking hilarious, so incredibly boring that I’m actually starting to fall asleep

  31. ElComanchero says:
    16 November 2011 at 17:13

    [..YouTube..] This is fucking hilarious, so incredibly boring that I’m actually starting to fall asleep

  32. ElComanchero says:
    16 November 2011 at 17:13

    [..YouTube..] This is fucking hilarious, so incredibly boring that I’m actually starting to fall asleep

  33. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:06

    [..YouTube..] @BathtubSkyPirate They’re talking about your mother and her period.

  34. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:06

    [..YouTube..] @BathtubSkyPirate They’re talking about your mother and her period.

  35. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:06

    [..YouTube..] @BathtubSkyPirate They’re talking about your mother and her period.

  36. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:06

    [..YouTube..] @BathtubSkyPirate They’re talking about your mother and her period.

  37. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:06

    [..YouTube..] @BathtubSkyPirate They’re talking about your mother and her period.

  38. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:06

    [..YouTube..] @BathtubSkyPirate They’re talking about your mother and her period.

  39. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:06

    [..YouTube..] @BathtubSkyPirate They’re talking about your mother and her period.

  40. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:06

    [..YouTube..] @BathtubSkyPirate They’re talking about your mother and her period.

  41. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:06

    [..YouTube..] @BathtubSkyPirate They’re talking about your mother and her period.

  42. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:06

    [..YouTube..] @BathtubSkyPirate They’re talking about your mother and her period.

  43. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  44. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  45. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  46. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  47. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  48. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  49. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  50. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  51. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  52. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  53. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  54. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  55. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  56. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  57. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  58. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  59. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  60. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  61. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  62. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  63. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  64. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  65. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  66. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  67. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  68. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  69. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  70. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  71. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  72. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  73. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  74. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  75. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  76. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  77. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  78. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  79. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  80. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  81. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  82. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  83. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  84. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  85. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  86. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  87. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  88. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  89. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  90. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  91. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  92. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  93. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  94. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  95. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  96. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  97. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  98. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  99. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  100. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  101. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  102. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  103. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  104. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  105. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  106. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  107. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  108. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  109. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  110. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  111. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  112. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  113. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  114. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  115. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  116. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  117. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  118. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  119. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  120. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  121. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  122. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  123. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  124. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  125. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  126. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  127. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  128. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  129. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”

  130. PierreRMB says:
    16 November 2011 at 20:17

    [..YouTube..] I agree with the first French guy. I need to learn German in order to give my opinion about the second speaker. For the third speaker, If he wants France and Germany to stand behind the European Comision, then he should improve to make an actual European Government, instead of a European version of the Article of Confederacy. As for the Forth speaker, I say, “If you are going to do all talk but no proposition, like Malcom X did, then you might not talk at all.”